Imagine five cities: A, B, C, D, and obviously, E.
Now imagine a car coming out of the city A, passing through the city B, then by C and so on. The notion of movement is very clear in this example, right? Even a child could see that the car is moving in relation to cities. There is a stream here.
Now imagine five subsequent times: A, B, C, D, and guess what, E.
Imagine there are five immediate moment.
For example, the instant B is one thousandth of a second after the instant A.
The moment C is one thousandth of a second after the instant B, and so on.
Imagine also that you are at the moment B. Well, if you are at the time B, this means that the
moment A is a thing of the past, and that the other moments are events of the future.
So, this range began at moment A, it passed by the moment B (where it is now) and it will "go" to instant C. At first we have the impression that something is
moving, that the present moment is moving between points A, B, C, D etc. But lets think better.
Our consciousness exists only in the present moment. Therefore, our consciousness exists only in the moment B of this example. But to an observer who lives in the instant "A", the present moment would be "A", not "B". Let me turn to the example of the car.
Imagine that the car is in town "B". If the car is in town "B", an observer in the city "A" say that the car is in town "B"; an observer who is in
City "B" will say that the car is in city "B"; an observer who is in town "C" say, too, that the car is in town "B", and so on.
But in the flow of time this is totally weird. If we are at time "B", an observer at the instant "B" say that the present time is the time "B". An observer in
The moment "A" would say that the present moment is the time "A" (and not "B"), because for him, "B" is a future event.
An observer at the instant "C" say that the present time is the time "C", and so on.
Where is now the concept of flow of time? Simply does not exist. For the idea of "flow of time" make some sense, it should be relative to some external reference point. This external point, however, need to have another reference point outside yet, and so successively in endless repetitions. So this business of the flow of time, as I said, exists only in our imagination.
It makes much more sense to think about parallel universes, or a multiverse in which there are many "nows". When we think of a multiverse, and not in an infinite line of time, those cases of people who dream of something that really happens days later becomes not totally absurd. But that is another discussion, and now I have no time for it.
Big Hug
Everton Spolaor - From south of Brazil.
Writer (author of "Inteligência: caminhos para a plenitude"), mechanical engineer and lost in time.